In the journey from providing bespoke professional services to more scalable products and productized services (what we call “productizing”), firms often stumble at a critical juncture: the transition from Minimum Viable Product (MVP) to a standardized, scalable solution. This pivotal moment represents a challenging phase where promising innovations can either succeed or falter.
Perhaps the most dangerous misconception in productization is treating an MVP as a finished product. An MVP, by definition, is a test—a learning vehicle designed to validate assumptions with minimal investment. Yet all too often, executives see early traction and immediately shift focus to scaling sales efforts without hardening the product for true scalability.
This is akin to a restaurant owner who creates a well-received dish during a tasting event, then immediately opens multiple locations without standardizing the recipe, sourcing ingredients at scale, or training staff uniformly. The result is inconsistent quality, disappointed customers, and potential damage to the brand.
The Premature Scaling Trap
Consider the cautionary tale of NimbleCore*, a mid-sized strategy consultancy that developed an innovative competitive intelligence platform. After successfully deploying their MVP with three enterprise clients who appreciated the personalized approach, NimbleCore's leadership team saw significant opportunity. They quickly hired several new salespeople to "capitalize on market momentum" while allocating minimal resources to product development.
The results were predictable but challenging:
Within nine months, NimbleCore found itself in a difficult position. Their MVP, which worked well in controlled environments with high-touch support, simply wasn't designed for scale.
The "Beta" Bridge
How might NimbleCore have avoided this common pitfall? One effective approach is explicitly labeling post-MVP offerings as "beta" products, creating a crucial bridge between initial concept and mature product.
CloudOps Solutions*, now a successful player in workflow automation, employed this strategy effectively in its early days. After initial success with their IT governance MVP, they deliberately maintained a "beta" designation for new modules even as they expanded sales. This simple linguistic choice accomplished several important objectives:
The beta designation essentially functions as a way to allow companies to continue growing while acknowledging the product's evolving nature.
The Product Development Continuum
AnalyticsMasters*, a data science consultancy that we work with, learned this lesson through experience with their predictive analytics platform. After initial success with their MVP, they expanded sales without comparable investment in product development. The result was client disappointment, reduced margins, and eventually, a product redesign.
With our help, AnalyticsMasters embraced a product development approach with clear stages:
This structured approach allowed them to balance growth with necessary product refinement, ultimately building a sustainable platform.
The Garden vs. Assembly Line Metaphor
Think of the transition from MVP to scalable product as moving from gardening to manufacturing. An MVP is like a carefully tended garden plot—effective and productive but requiring constant attention from a skilled gardener. Each plant receives individualized care, making the output impressive but fundamentally limited in scale.
A mature product, by contrast, requires the precision and repeatability of an assembly line. While it may lack some of the customized qualities of the garden, it produces consistent, reliable results at scale without requiring specialists at every step.
The transition between these approaches doesn't happen overnight. It requires deliberate investment in:
The Financial Reality
The financial implications of premature scaling are significant. When NimbleCore's margins decreased, they were facing a structural challenge. Their MVP required approximately 120 hours of customization per client:
After proper product development, implementation requirements might drop significantly:
This contrast illustrates why scaling an underdeveloped product can create financial challenges.
Organizational Alignment
Perhaps most importantly, successfully bridging the MVP-to-product transition requires organizational alignment. StrategyForge*, a prominent management consultancy, encountered this when their performance visualization MVP gained traction. While their technology team recognized the need for continued development, their sales organization pushed for immediate scaling.
The solution came from establishing a cross-functional "Product Board" with representation from product development, sales, delivery, and finance. This group created a roadmap that balanced growth targets with essential product improvement milestones. They implemented a beta program with tiered pricing that reflected the product's evolving maturity, allowing them to grow revenue while continuing necessary development.
Conclusion
The journey from MVP to scalable product isn't a single step but rather a deliberate progression requiring patience, investment, and organizational discipline. By recognizing that an MVP is just the beginning—not the end—of the product development journey, B2B professional services firms can avoid the premature scaling challenge.
Whether through explicit "beta" labeling, structured development continuums, or cross-functional governance, successful firms find ways to manage expectations while continuing to refine their offerings. The most successful productization efforts recognize that the path from service to scalable product requires as much attention to the transition as to the destination itself.
Recommended Resources:
*Pseudonym